<p>The heated controversy over Jezebel's $10,000 bounty for nonphotoshopped pictures of Lena Dunham from Annie Liebovitz's cover shoot for Vogue is about to take an ironic turn.</p><p>For those who have not been following along: Jezebel editors wanted to see photos of what they surely expected to be yet another example of the "insidious" and self-esteem obliterating practice of postproduction nipping and tucking at women's magazines. The site has basically cornered the market on the Photoshop reveal. But it turned out that Vogue's photos of Dunham were minimally retouched and Dunham's co-star Adam Driver also came in for some smoothing and sculpting. (Interestingly, Dunham's February 2013 Rolling Stone cover did not inspire a similar investigative effort.)</p><p>STORY: Jezebel Offers $10,000 for Unretouched Lena Dunham Vogue Photos</p><p>This time Jezebel's trolling appears to have backfired as the outrage has mostly been directed at the site for attempting to hide behind a feminist mantle as it ogles an actress of nontraditional-by-Hollywood-standards proportions in a quest for easy page clicks.</p><p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/lena-dunham-photoshop-controversy-jezebels-673867">Keep reading...</a></p><p>Read also:</p><p><a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-01-24/opinion/ct-daum-lena-dunham-girls-vogue-photoshopping-body-20140124_1_dunham-vogue-daum">Daum: Covering (up) Lena Dunham</a> (Chicago Tribune)</p><p>Explore: <a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?ncl=dSJ9tz0tjLaBDEM-KdyQjBYSP_ywM&authuser=0&ned=us">75 additional articles.</a></p>